“Specific Page Title or Article Title” Ex: “Twilight: A negative influence on teens or just harmless fun?” | History: water pollution |
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc) Ex: POV | N/A |
Title of the Entire Website (not www. ) Ex: CBC News | pollutionissues.com |
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given) Ex: CBC | JRank |
Date Page was Last Revised Ex: 10 September 2010 | N/A |
Date You Read It Ex: 21 January 2012 | 8 February 2012 |
<URL address> (ALL of it) |
FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded): EX: The article cites Maria Nikolajeva, a professor of at Cambridge, as saying that Bella does not "in any way promote independent thinking or personal development" in women, instead portraying a woman "meek and willing to do anything for her vampire boyfriend" (POV). |
water pollution is taking place rapidly that from the "Middle Ages, it is worth noting that after World War II, the type of pollution involved changed significantly..... [using water the] Industries began manufacturing and using synthetic materials such as plastics"(pollution issues.com) using machines like steam engine and other sources that is used during the Victorian age industrial revolution. |
not only in the Victorian age but dating back to "in ancient Rome, sewers carried human waste into the Tiber River. By 312 B . C . E . the river was so polluted the Romans had to construct aqueducts to obtain clean drinking water."(pollutionissues.com) shows that he importance of water was not understood but taken granted as a mere sewage holder |
the water pollution outbreak not only in Rome but led to "the catalyst for many typhoid and cholera outbreaks throughout the centuries, in many parts of the world."(pollutionissues.com) the water was not safe to drink for Romans so the exposure was unable to ignore from Rome it invaded around the world |
as time pass by the disease outbreak was not only Rome or but "In 1854, a devastating cholera outbreak gripped the Soho part of London, centering around the Broad Street well."(polltionissues.com) the importance of water pollution and to stop them did not occur to london or any part of Europe until mid nineteenth century |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
the website was powered by the JRank who not only provide world issues and concerns about enviroment but with biology and other problems of the world. although it does not show who wrote the articles bu the information is reliable.
Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
there is no author in this website but the organization again funds this website is JRank.
Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
although at different angle it stands out as informative website but also it had provided me with enormous information about history of water pollution.
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
I did not detect any bias information since it only states the history of the water pollution
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
Whoever wrote the article did not site any website or references to show the true fact.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
I will use this website to support the history of the water pollution.
“Specific Page Title or Article Title” Ex: “Twilight: A negative influence on teens or just harmless fun?” | water and air polltion |
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given) (author, editor, producer, etc) Ex: POV | N/A |
Title of the Entire Website (not www. ) Ex: CBC News | History.com |
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website (if given) Ex: CBC | History |
Date Page was Last Revised Ex: 10 September 2010 | N/A |
Date You Read It Ex: 21 January 2012 | 9 February 2012 |
<URL address> (ALL of it) |
FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded): EX: The article cites Maria Nikolajeva, a professor of at Cambridge, as saying that Bella does not "in any way promote independent thinking or personal development" in women, instead portraying a woman "meek and willing to do anything for her vampire boyfriend" (POV). |
the situation in Ohio becomes the victim of water pollution" In 1969, chemical waste released into Ohio's Cuyahoga River caused it to burst into flames and the waterway became a symbol of how industrial pollution was destroying America's natural resources."(History.com) the situation in water pollution can hart the people around so much that it will be unpredictable of the outcome. |
recent investigation shows that before was London and other part of the Europe that has been polluted uncontrollably but now in 2007 " China is a perfect case in point. According to Greenpeace, around 70 percent of China's lakes and rivers are now polluted from industrial waste, leaving 300 million people 'forced to rely on polluted water supplies.'"( history.com) |
measures was taken to secure the water after the Ohio incident such as "In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act to reduce water pollution"(history.com) but still it had ill effect on the people because as years go by the people forget about the acts and such that hasn't been enforced for a long time. |
the industrial age has a little effect on us even though we have new technology to prevent such problem from occurring "In 2006, the Environmental News Service (ENS) reported that "more than 62 percent of industrial and municipal facilities across the country discharged more pollution into U.S. (history.com) |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
History channel brings lot of information that is provided by the people who work in the organization and some of them that holds degrees are doctors and bachelors and masters who works in according to their field.Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
there is no author in this website but since this is provided by the crew of the history channel i will believe that.Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
it is not informative but more helpful of gathered information about the background of water pollution.Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
I did not come across any biased information related to the history of water pollutionReferences: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
yes there was water.org, groundwater.org and the CNN.com
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
History channel brings lot of information that is provided by the people who work in the organization and some of them that holds degrees are doctors and bachelors and masters who works in according to their field.Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
there is no author in this website but since this is provided by the crew of the history channel i will believe that.Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
it is not informative but more helpful of gathered information about the background of water pollution.Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
I did not come across any biased information related to the history of water pollutionReferences: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
yes there was water.org, groundwater.org and the CNN.com
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
I will also use this and the other website to guide me through the history of the water pollution